Board logo

標題: [電腦硬件] hdd 邊隻牌子好? [打印本頁]

作者: baiya-laura    時間: 2010-7-6 08:57     標題: hdd 邊隻牌子好?

用來做data backup,外置,快慢都係次要,穩陣小鑊氣先係真.

其實一直都用開 WD Green,冇事.不過近日見有d forum唱到呢款好多鑊氣咁,而家想加隻1.5T(or 2T),心大心細,唔知有冇其他牌子選擇添呢?我見Hitachi同Seagate都更平.

Thanks!
作者: drkeee    時間: 2010-7-6 09:04

Use WD so called "server grade" HDD la.
作者: vupcj04    時間: 2010-7-6 09:08

祇要唔買死雞.
作者: baiya-laura    時間: 2010-7-6 09:15

>Use WD so called "server grade" HDD la.

錢都係一個考慮.
作者: automann    時間: 2010-7-6 09:20

Seagate Server Grade 唔好咩? 點解?
作者: lovememm    時間: 2010-7-6 09:25

>>Use WD so called "server grade" HDD la.
>錢都係一個考慮.

Actually, just for data backup (i.e low usage), WD green should be OK. If you want something better and can't stretch to "server grade", WD black should be good enough for most applications.
作者: 白少爷    時間: 2010-7-6 09:32

I bought 2 Hitachi 2TB recently (at HKD9xx).  There is no problem so far.  I think that they are good enough for backup purpose.  I used WD green before but those new version WD green harddisk use advance format and need special manipulation under XP so I change to Hitachi.




作者: baiya-laura    時間: 2010-7-6 09:35

What is the special manipulation by WD?

I use Win7, but don't want any special manipulation as portability is important.
作者: sduofficer    時間: 2010-7-6 09:39

In Win XP and under some other conditions, you need to run an utiliy before using the latest WD green harddisks.  Not so user friendly to me.  See the link below:


http://www.wdc.com/en/products/advancedformat/



作者: baiya-laura    時間: 2010-7-6 09:46

Thanks cumk.

I don't like extra steps for adding an utility too.

Would go for Hitachi.
作者: 黑泽明    時間: 2010-7-6 09:49

祇要唔買死雞.x2



Seagate Server Grade 唔好咩? 點解?
============================
不要問,只要信!
作者: luyuan801231    時間: 2010-7-6 09:56

祇要唔買死雞.x3
作者: johnnyin    時間: 2010-7-6 10:04

I had bad experience with IBM (later then sell it to Hitachi). ever since, I am not buying Deskstar.  Seagate, a lot of problem reported, so I am staying away too.  

Now I am in WD Enterprise grade only........
作者: putin728    時間: 2010-7-6 10:12

有HITACHI, 有FUJITSU, 有WD, 有SEAGATE.........

都係GOLDEN買到平既款
唯一一隻囉過去聯強換既....
就係SEAGATE
作者: feiera    時間: 2010-7-6 10:20

The problem with Seagate is that there were occasional "lemons". I have mixed experience with Seagates, some lasted for a very long time and some lasted only for a couple of years.
作者: teddyboy14    時間: 2010-7-6 10:28

我用緊7隻WD既HD,500,640,1TB 2TB,7X24咁BT,
兩年以都未有死過

當然可以當係個別事件啦,2TB仲係最近先買,唔可以作準,不過我覺得唔錯
作者: williams47    時間: 2010-7-6 10:36

祇要唔買死雞.x4....
作者: baiya-laura    時間: 2010-7-6 10:44

唔該晒咁多位.

似乎只有死雞一面倒劣評, 會小心.

thanks!
作者: gulao7    時間: 2010-7-6 10:50

我只買WD HDD
作者: 老豬    時間: 2010-7-6 10:53

想買SSD裝window7多d
作者: asd520250    時間: 2010-7-6 11:00

用來做data backup,外置,快慢都係次要,穩陣小鑊氣先係真.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any brand but Seagxxx
作者: bowie5    時間: 2010-7-6 11:08

啱啱屎咗隻wd1T green,做外置裝data不到一年,早兩曰抄data一完即無法辨識,毫無預兆!
作者: atom    時間: 2010-7-6 11:15

死雞次次都係成 lot HD 有事

其他牌子多數係個別事件
作者: leepim1    時間: 2010-7-6 11:24

I have bought a 2nd hand Seagate HD taking out from an ext. HD with waranty up to 2012.but it is out of order after a while.
As I check the s/n no. with the dealer and he said if dismount from enclosure, waranty void.
Pls advise? Should I find an enclosure?
作者: jackenwil    時間: 2010-7-6 11:30

我諗死雞都係一時時。
我有一隻2.5同一隻3.5。
用左兩年都無咩事。

反而有隻“水牛”2.5用左三個月就死左。


作者: 外来的    時間: 2010-7-6 11:36

WD "YS" Server Grade HDD




歡迎光臨 AMIGOBBS 論壇 (暫停運作) (http://www.amigobbs.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0